[Rivet] Rivet Analysis for Z+jets still not publicly available

[Ulla Blumenschein]

Hi Roman,

The files in the afs directory:
/afs/cern.ch/atlas/groups/Generators/Rivet/Analyses/ATLAS_2011_I945498
have a time stamp of  April 2013.
Where are the final versions from summer?

Many thanks in advance,
Ulla



On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Roman Lysak <lysak at fzu.cz> wrote:
>
>  Hi Ulla,
>
>
>
> On 12/04/2013 09:49 AM, Ulla Blumenschein wrote:
>>
>> Hi Roman,
>>
>> Could you send me a clear instruction, what people have to do if they
>> want to use the final version of
>> ATLAS_2011_I945498 ? Can they used precompiled versions or do they
>> have to compile themselves?
>
> We keep the ATLAS analyses also locally on lxplus in
>
> /afs/cern.ch/atlas/groups/Generators/Rivet/Analyses
>
> as it is written on web page
>
> https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/AtlasProtected/RivetMCValidation#Completed_Analyses
>
> This particular analysis is in subdirectory:
>
> UNOFFICIAL/ATLAS_2011_I945498
>
> There is a code (so you can build plugin by yourself using
> 'rivet-buildplugin RivetATLAS_2011_I945498.so ATLAS_2011_I945498.cc')  and
> also a compiled plugin so you can directly use it (just make sure it's in
> your RIVET paths, or just copy to your working directory).
> There is a plan to make the analyses sitting in that area available for the
> users by just sourcing one script, but we are not yet there.
>
>
>
>>
>> We are seeing some strange features in one of the analysis and I have
>> the impression that people are using older versions.
>> If I look e.g. in the 1.8 branch, the .cc and .aida files  have not
>> been touched since 17 months, so this is obviosly the wrong branch to
>> use.
>
> I can see that Andy already put this analysis into 2012-06-aidarivet branch,
> so you can even take it from web page.
> Note, once there will be a new release of rivet, you will not need to do any
> of this, just setup that particular version and you should have the analysis
> available.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Cheers,
>   Roman
>
>
>>
>> Many thanks in advance,
>> Ulla
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Roman Lysak <lysak at fzu.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Dear Ulla,
>>>
>>> the 2011 analysis is already in Rivet:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/browser/src/Analyses/ATLAS_2013_I1230812.cc
>>>
>>> Regarding ATLAS_2011_I945498, this was validated and I already sent it to
>>> rivet authors (cc-ing) some time ago.
>>> As far as I know, there should be a new rivet release tagged very soon,
>>> so I
>>> guess it will appear in it then (the Rivet authors could comment maybe).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>    Roman
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2013 08:47 PM, Ulla Blumenschein wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> The 2010 Analysis still appears as unvalidated in the official Rivet
>>>> page:
>>>> http://rivet.hepforge.org/analyses#ATLAS_2011_I945498
>>>>
>>>> The 2011 analysis, ATLAS_2013_I1230812,  doesn't appear at all in the
>>>> official page
>>>>
>>>> Are these analyses now in a public release?
>>>> Can you please tell me  whom to contact to  finalize the integration
>>>> into a public release and the display in the official rivet page?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks in advance,
>>>> Ulla
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Frank Siegert <frank.siegert at cern.ch>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Roman, all,
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wonder whether we even still need the "old" analysis, given that
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> new one operates at the same energy and simply has much more
>>>>>>> statistics?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> physics wise probably not , but I'm not sure what's yours (i.e. Rivet
>>>>>> authors) policy, e.g. whether you remove any analysis from Rivet after
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> time, etc.
>>>>>> Anyway, I already fixed the analysis and sent to rivet mailing list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, thanks. There is no removal after a certain time, only if it
>>>>> remains unvalidated. But I agree with Ulla's point to keep this
>>>>> analysis alive.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> As soon as Katharina has confirmed which email address she wants to
>>>>>>> see used in the info files I can commit it directly (or you can send
>>>>>>> it to Rivet and I take it from there, either is fine for me).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm o.k. with you directly commit the analysis.
>>>>>> Once you do this, let us know the revision number (we keep it on our
>>>>>> web
>>>>>> page, mainly to make sure the analysis we sent to rivet was really
>>>>>> included
>>>>>> in there).
>>>>>
>>>>> This is done now, both on Rivet trunk (2.x):
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/1b56f3cb68de5f7a52e845aa240caac3247b88d6/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/18c076e33bf6de6d1be9a154bcf745488846f55d/
>>>>>
>>>>> and the aida branch (1.8.x):
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/adec40756f76f07e6113e52ac96d6cd0892ed3e3/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/d4175dbb5f1ca7bde764322710145e98f99e634e/
>>>>>
>>>>> (two commits each, because I forgot a few files in the first commits)
>>>>> The changeset ID in which all of this is included is 4140:18c076e33bf6.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
    Ulla Blumenschein
    II Physik, Uni Goettingen
    Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, D01.110
    phone: 0049-551-397645
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/