[Rivet] different 'year' in routine names

[Christian Gutschow]

Hi,

just to follow up — Graeme kindly explained to me how HepData chooses the plugin name and pointed out that you can pass a ?format=yoda&rivet={plugin name} to the url, e.g.

https://hepdata.net/record/ins1625109?format=yoda&rivet=ATLAS_2017_I1625109

which will overwrite its initial guess. I suppose there’s no need to make the plugin names match then.

Just to say, I’ve added this option to rivet-mkanalysis now as well.

Cheers,
Chris


On 21 Aug 2018, at 18:06, Christian Gütschow <chris.g at cern.ch<mailto:chris.g at cern.ch>> wrote:

Hi team,

while going through some of the mismatches between HepData and Rivet trunk I noticed that

ATLAS_2017_I1625109

in the Rivet trunk is called

ATLAS_2018_I1625109

by HepData.

This particular one popped on the arXiv in September 2017 and was accepted by the journal in February 2018. I would have thought 2017 is the year that matters since we want to be able to submit Rivet routines straightaway / we also have routines for conf note results, which don’t have journal acceptances.

What is the policy meant to be here?

Cheers,
Chris

 —

 Dr. Christian Gütschow

 Department of Physics and Astronomy
 University College London
 Gower Street
 London WC1E 6BT







 —

 Dr. Christian Gütschow

 Department of Physics and Astronomy
 University College London
 Gower Street
 London WC1E 6BT



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.hepforge.org/lists-archive/rivet/attachments/20180822/2ec264ec/attachment.html>