[Rivet] Rivet analysis CMS_2013_I1208923

[Xavier Janssen]

Hi Holger,

I think the only reason was efficiency by being able to use dedicated phase space cuts in the generation for each of them.
However we tested the merged plugin and confirm that it also reproduce the paper results, so we did not complained back and you should consider this topic closed.

Cheers, Xavier.

PS: We are also investigating some modifications (replace custom made Z selection by the ZFinder class) you did in CMS_2015_I1310737 as we realised last week that the results are not fully identical. I think that was already released in 2.3.0 and we will let you know but I am afraid the test/understanding might no be completed for 2.4.0.

On 05 Oct 2015, at 10:15, Holger Schulz <holger.schulz at durham.ac.uk<mailto:holger.schulz at durham.ac.uk>> wrote:

Hi Javier,

just ticking off remaining things to do for Rivet 2.4.0 and I came across
this jet analysis which was submitted as two separate analyses.
The hepdata entry (http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1208923) and the
publication  (http://inspirehep.net/record/1208923) are identical, however,
as is the analysis cut flow. So I went ahead and combined the two
analyses
CMS_2013_I1208923_DIJETMASS
CMS_2013_I1208923_JETPT
into one single analysis
CMS_2013_I1208923
I remember that CMS preferred the analyses being separate but I don't
remember the reason. Could you please let us know?

Cheers,
Holger

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.hepforge.org/lists-archive/rivet/attachments/20151005/3fc43973/attachment.html>