<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Hi Holger,</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I think the only reason was efficiency by being able to use dedicated phase space cuts in the generation for each of them.</div>
<div class="">However we tested the merged plugin and confirm that it also reproduce the paper results, so we did not complained back and you should consider this topic closed.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Cheers, Xavier.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">PS: We are also investigating some modifications (replace custom made Z selection by the ZFinder class) you did in <font face="Helvetica Neue" class="">CMS_2015_I1310737 as we realised last week that the results are not fully identical. I think
that was already released in 2.3.0 </font><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue';" class="">and we will let you know but I am afraid the test/understanding might no be completed for 2.4.0.</span></div>
<br class="">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On 05 Oct 2015, at 10:15, Holger Schulz <<a href="mailto:holger.schulz@durham.ac.uk" class="">holger.schulz@durham.ac.uk</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" class="">Hi Javier,<br class="">
<br class="">
just ticking off remaining things to do for Rivet 2.4.0 and I came across<br class="">
this jet analysis which was submitted as two separate analyses.<br class="">
The hepdata entry (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1208923">http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1208923</a>) and the
<br class="">
publication (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://inspirehep.net/record/1208923">http://inspirehep.net/record/1208923</a>) are identical, however,<br class="">
as is the analysis cut flow. So I went ahead and combined the two<br class="">
analyses<br class="">
<blockquote class="">CMS_2013_I1208923_DIJETMASS<br class="">
CMS_2013_I1208923_JETPT<br class="">
</blockquote>
into one single analysis<br class="">
<blockquote class="">CMS_2013_I1208923<br class="">
</blockquote>
I remember that CMS preferred the analyses being separate but I don't <br class="">
remember the reason. Could you please let us know?<br class="">
<br class="">
Cheers,<br class="">
Holger<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</body>
</html>