[Rivet] CMS_2015_I1370682.tgz

[David Grellscheid]

Hi all,

Opinions on this? I'm tempted to say yes, with a caveat that the 
CMS_PseudoTop projection

(1) has to pass review by us, independently of any given analysis
(2) gets a versioned name like CMS_PseudoTop_2015 and
(3) does _not_ get its physics changed later without a version change

(3) is particularly important to avoid a potential combinatoric 
nightmare of tracing intentions on older papers using the same analysis.

See you,

   David



On 27/11/2015 20:42, Janssen Xavier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am submitting the first TOP plugin from CMS but we need to discuss as the people responsible for it wrote a ‘PseudoTop’ class that they intend to re-use across different analysis in the future.
> I am not sure however how this works for you and maybe it needs ad minima renaming to CMS_PseudoTop
>
> Let me known,
>
> Xavier,
> _______________________________________________
> Rivet mailing list
> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
>