[Rivet] 1102.4748

[Roberto Franceschini]

Dear Andy,
  thanks for replying. In a sense this a legacy analysis, so it is important to have it.  I think is possible some might say that SLD fragmentation results are good enough for MC tuning today, still this analysis seems to be the more complete as it has considered all other previous measurements (including SLD). In doing that they introduce correlations and all that so it might be good if some authors of the paper are involved. Concerning my involvement, I would not exclude it, as I am always interested to see how the sausage is made, but I should mention I have no idea about how rivet works.
Best,
Roberto






> On 10 mag 2016, at 01:38, Andy Buckley <andy.buckley at cern.ch> wrote:
> 
> Hi Roberto,
> 
> We don't have an active "pipeline" for reimplementation of old analyses, the focus having moved more to the current experiments supplying them along with publication. But this would definitely be good to have... I'll see what we can do. Unless you would like to implement it?
> 
> Andy
> 
> 
>> On 05/05/16 12:59, roberto franceschini wrote:
>> Hello,
>>  I think 1102.4748 is not in the list of implemented analyses and I was
>> wondering if it somewhere in the pipeline or not. Is the final word of
>> LEP on b fragmentation, therefore is sort of superseding
>> SLD_2002_S4869273 and DELPHI_ 2002_ 069_CONF _ 603.
>> Thanks for your reply,
>> Roberto
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rivet mailing list
>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
>> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr Andy Buckley, Lecturer / Royal Society University Research Fellow
> Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow