[Rivet] Rivet Analysis for Z+jets still not publicly available

[Ulla Blumenschein]

Hello Roman,

Many thanks for the feedback.
I am not sure who is maintaining the official Rivet pages but as long
as we don't advertise our analyses there or while they still appear as
unvalidated, the theory experts will not use the analysis for their
publications.

Many thanks in advance for support,
Ulla



On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Roman Lysak <lysak at fzu.cz> wrote:
>
>  Dear Ulla,
>
> the 2011 analysis is already in Rivet:
>
> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/browser/src/Analyses/ATLAS_2013_I1230812.cc
>
> Regarding ATLAS_2011_I945498, this was validated and I already sent it to
> rivet authors (cc-ing) some time ago.
> As far as I know, there should be a new rivet release tagged very soon, so I
> guess it will appear in it then (the Rivet authors could comment maybe).
>
> Cheers,
>   Roman
>
>
>
> On 11/29/2013 08:47 PM, Ulla Blumenschein wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> The 2010 Analysis still appears as unvalidated in the official Rivet page:
>> http://rivet.hepforge.org/analyses#ATLAS_2011_I945498
>>
>> The 2011 analysis, ATLAS_2013_I1230812,  doesn't appear at all in the
>> official page
>>
>> Are these analyses now in a public release?
>> Can you please tell me  whom to contact to  finalize the integration
>> into a public release and the display in the official rivet page?
>>
>> Many thanks in advance,
>> Ulla
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Frank Siegert <frank.siegert at cern.ch>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Roman, all,
>>>
>>>>> I wonder whether we even still need the "old" analysis, given that the
>>>>> new one operates at the same energy and simply has much more
>>>>> statistics?
>>>>
>>>> physics wise probably not , but I'm not sure what's yours (i.e. Rivet
>>>> authors) policy, e.g. whether you remove any analysis from Rivet after
>>>> some
>>>> time, etc.
>>>> Anyway, I already fixed the analysis and sent to rivet mailing list.
>>>
>>> Ok, thanks. There is no removal after a certain time, only if it
>>> remains unvalidated. But I agree with Ulla's point to keep this
>>> analysis alive.
>>>
>>>>> As soon as Katharina has confirmed which email address she wants to
>>>>> see used in the info files I can commit it directly (or you can send
>>>>> it to Rivet and I take it from there, either is fine for me).
>>>>
>>>> I'm o.k. with you directly commit the analysis.
>>>> Once you do this, let us know the revision number (we keep it on our web
>>>> page, mainly to make sure the analysis we sent to rivet was really
>>>> included
>>>> in there).
>>>
>>> This is done now, both on Rivet trunk (2.x):
>>>
>>>
>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/1b56f3cb68de5f7a52e845aa240caac3247b88d6/
>>>
>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/18c076e33bf6de6d1be9a154bcf745488846f55d/
>>>
>>> and the aida branch (1.8.x):
>>>
>>>
>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/adec40756f76f07e6113e52ac96d6cd0892ed3e3/
>>>
>>> https://rivet.hepforge.org/trac/changeset/d4175dbb5f1ca7bde764322710145e98f99e634e/
>>>
>>> (two commits each, because I forgot a few files in the first commits)
>>> The changeset ID in which all of this is included is 4140:18c076e33bf6.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
    Ulla Blumenschein
    II Physik, Uni Goettingen
    Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, D01.110
    phone: 0049-551-397645
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/