[Rivet] Making prelim/unvalidated Rivet ATLAS analyses "proper"

Andy Buckley andy.buckley at cern.ch
Mon Dec 2 10:16:26 GMT 2013


Excellent, thanks very much :-)

On 02/12/13 10:26, Roman Lysak wrote:
> 
>  Hi Andy,
> 
> sorry for the late response, yes, we will check all of the analyses below.
> 
> Roman
> 
> 
> On 11/24/2013 09:22 PM, Andy Buckley wrote:
>> Hi Roman and Kiran,
>>
>> I'm just in the process of making the long-awaited Rivet 1.8.4 release,
>> which includes several of the "new" and updated analysis codes that you
>> provided. Sorry about the delay, but what manpower we had went into
>> getting version 2 out (and the Athena interface will be updated to use
>> that fairly soon after the 1.8.4 update).
>>
>> As well as the new analyses that you supplied, and whatever is in the
>> pipeline right now, I noticed that we actually have a big collection of
>> ATLAS analyses in Rivet which are either marked as preliminary or
>> unvalidated:
>>
>> if ENABLE_PRELIMINARY
>> RivetATLASAnalyses_la_SOURCES += \
>>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_001.cc
>> endif
>> if ENABLE_UNVALIDATED
>> RivetATLASAnalyses_la_SOURCES += \
>>      ATLAS_2010_CONF_2010_049.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2011_S9041966.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2011_CONF_2011_090.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2011_CONF_2011_098.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2011_S9108483.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2011_S9212353.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2011_S9035664.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_I1083318.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_I1095236.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_I1082009.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_I946427.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_I1126136.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_I1180197.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_I1186556.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_I1190891.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_103.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_104.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_105.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_109.cc \
>>      ATLAS_2012_CONF_2012_153.cc
>> endif
>>
>> That's an excerpt from the Rivet build file, so you can see that these
>> don't get installed by default, e.g. in the Genser build of Rivet that
>> we use in ATLAS. So it would be good to get the prelim one (and the
>> unvalidated CONF note ones) updated to match the final published forms,
>> and for as many of the other unvalidated ones as possible to be checked
>> and made official. Could you see what you can do about that? Hopefully
>> an easy way to get a few more happy green boxes on your Rivet-ATLAS
>> implementation table ;-)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andy
>>
> 


-- 
Dr Andy Buckley, Royal Society University Research Fellow
Particle Physics Expt Group, University of Glasgow / PH Dept, CERN


More information about the Rivet mailing list