|
[Rivet] delta phi of jets with sherpaUlrike Schnoor ulrike.schnoor at physik.tu-dresden.deThu Sep 15 11:54:46 BST 2011
Hi Frank, no, the generators don't give the same total cross section, but they are in the same order of magnitude. Also I am using the option -x 1.0 and normalizing to cross-section/sumofweights. The units line in the hepmc files show GEV and MM for both. Whizard gives its cross-sections in fb, whereas Sherpa gives them in pb, perhaps that is the reason for the large difference? Is there a way to tell rivet the unit that the generator is using? (Sorry if this is an ignorant question.) Thanks, Ulrike 2011/9/15 Frank Siegert <frank.siegert at cern.ch>: > Hi Ulrike, > > this is clearly not a Rivet question, but a generator question. Have you > checked whether both generators give the same total cross section for the > same cuts? Also, is it possible that the units in the HepMC file are > accidently inconsistent with what the generator claims (normally pb and > GeV)? > > Frank > > On 15/09/11 11:10, Ulrike Schnoor wrote: >> >> Dear RIVET experts, >> >> When using RIVET to compare WHIZARD (hepmc files) to SHERPA (hepmc2g >> files) I ran into the following problem with the azimuthal angle of >> the jets' FourMomentum, which is happening with my own analysis as >> well as with MC_WWJETS: >> There are far less entries in the jets' phi or delta phi plots for >> Sherpa than for Whizard. You can see this in the following plot made >> with MC_WWJETS: >> http://iktp.tu-dresden.de/~schnoor/rivet/jets_dphi_12.pdf. Has this >> happened before, and what could I do to avoid this? I have already >> tried to rescale the histograms, with no effect. >> The same is happening in my private analysis that also needs the >> azimuthal angle of jets. In addition, the MET distributions of the two >> generators look rather different as shown in this plot: >> http://iktp.tu-dresden.de/~schnoor/rivet/MC_VBS/missingET.pdf >> Could this be related to the problem with the jets' phi coordinates? >> >> Please have a look at this and let me know if you need more information. >> Many thanks, >> Ulrike >> _______________________________________________ >> Rivet mailing list >> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org >> http://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet >
More information about the Rivet mailing list |