|
[Rivet] ZFinder problem reportAndy Buckley andy.buckley at ed.ac.ukFri Sep 9 17:29:31 BST 2011
Hi Elena, Can you clarify what you expected the Rivet photon clustering arguments to do and what you are actually seeing? Cheers, Andy On 06/09/11 11:26, Andy Buckley wrote: > On 30/08/11 19:19, Yatsenko, Elena wrote: >> Hello, >> >> During implementation of the ATLAS ZpT analysis with Rivet v1.6.0 >> we've found a problem in ZFinder class with clusterPhotons flag. >> If clusterPhotons =«false» dR cut is not effective for the 4 momentum >> of the Z boson . >> So in our case >> >> ZFinder zfinder_dressed_el(-2.4, 2.4, 20, ELECTRON, 66.0*GeV, >> 116.0*GeV, 0.1, false, false); >> and >> ZFinder zfinder_bare_el(-2.4, 2.4, 20, ELECTRON, 66.0*GeV, 116.0*GeV, >> 0.0, false, false); >> >> will give the same results. While the class documentation suggest that >> clusterPhotons is meant to only correct the 4 vectors of the decay >> lepton. > > Hi again Elena, > > I think that the main issue here is that the class documentation needs > to be improved on W/ZFinder and LeptonClusters to explain exactly what > these bool flags imply. It's been redeveloped a bit recently and *I'm* > not entirely sure what Frank intended! > > What do *you* expect these flags to do? My understanding is that if you > set clusterPhotons=false then the Z mass will be constructed without > using dR: I'm not sure why we have a separate flag for that, but > presumably there has been a use case for it. I think that the > trackPhotons flag is used to decide whether or not the photons are > attached to the returned leptons, from my reading of the docstring, but > Frank should clarify that: it is a bit confusing. > > Cheers, > Andy > -- Dr Andy Buckley SUPA Advanced Research Fellow Particle Physics Experiment Group, University of Edinburgh The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
More information about the Rivet mailing list |