[Rivet] [Rivet-svn] r2972 - trunk/data/anainfo

[Andy Buckley]

On 25/02/11 10:51, Frank Siegert wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
>> Log:
>> Mark superseded CDF 2009 min bias note as obsolete (should we also
>> have a RivetObsolete.so?)
> 
> I'd vote against many different Rivet*.so libraries. It's always
> annoying when one moves an analysis from one library (e.g.
> RivetUnvalidated) to another (e.g. RivetATLAS) because one has to
> manually clean and re-make the former, otherwise one runs into a
> duplicate error.
> 
> I saw the point for the unvalidated ones at first, because we don't want
> to compile them by default. But on further thought: Shouldn't it be
> possible to simply exclude them like
> 
> RivetATLASAnalyses_la_SOURCES = \
> if ENABLE_UNVALIDATED
>     ATLAS_2010_CONF_2010_049.cc
> endif
>     ATLAS_2010_S8591806.cc \
>     ATLAS_2010_S8817804.cc \
>     ATLAS_2010_S8894728.cc \
>     ATLAS_2010_S8914702.cc \
>     ATLAS_2010_S8918562.cc \
>     ATLAS_2010_S8919674.cc \
>     ATLAS_2011_S8924791.cc \
>     ATLAS_2011_S8971293.cc
> 
> ?

That seems pretty sensible: rebuilding when analyses move is annoying.
Worth making the makefile a bit messy, I think! Any objections to doing
things this way from 1.5.0 onward?

Andy

-- 
Dr Andy Buckley
SUPA Advanced Research Fellow
Particle Physics Experiment Group, University of Edinburgh

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.