[Rivet] [Fastjet] Problem with JADE plugin?

[Frank Siegert]

Hendrik Hoeth, Monday 28 June 2010:
> Thus spake Frank Siegert (frank.siegert at durham.ac.uk):
> > The MC_JetAnalysis was already fine fortunately, and the others
> > were all Durham algo, so they should be ok, given what you saw in
> > JADE_OPAL.
> 
> Is there any reason to believe that Durham is not affected? I don't
> think so ...

No, I meant that Durham should be ok _after_ my commit even though I 
hadn't validated it (based on Andy's testing of Durham with ymerge_max 
in JADE_OPAL).

Frank