[Rivet] Binning mismatch [Re: Bug in H1_2000_S4129130?]

[Peter Richardson]

Hi Ben,

   O.K. That explains why I didn't see it as I'm using a c++ program to 
parse the aida instead.

   P.S. I had to fix a bug in the sign of the pseudorapidity as well but 
the plots look O.K. again now

Peter

On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Ben Waugh wrote:

> Hi Andy, All,
>
> The issue with the binning seems to be due to the fact that there is a gap 
> between eta of -2 and -1 in the published data. Presumably this is related to 
> the detector acceptance. The Rivet analysis does include a bin in this 
> region,
> and compare-histos doesn't like the fact that the bins are different.
>
> We should think about how compare-histos should deal with this situation, but 
> I don't think there is anything (obviously) wrong with the Rivet analysis.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
>
> On 04/01/10 19:45, Andy Buckley wrote:
>> Thanks Peter. Ben and Alexander, please take a look and see if there are 
>> any obvious problems.
>> 
>> Andy
>> 
>> 
>> On 29/12/09 15:02, Peter Richardson wrote:
>>> Hi Ben et al,
>>> 
>>> So I've had a look and fixed the beams and dealt with some of the to
>>> dos, the binning in Q2 and x into the individual histograms looks O.K.
>>> to me, i.e. as in the corresponding HZTOOL analysis I copied it from. If
>>> the reference data from HEPDATa is O.K. I'm not sure what else can go
>>> wrong.
>>> 
>>> Peter
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Ben Waugh wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Andy, Alex,
>>>> 
>>>> I would do this but
>>>> (a) I'm on holiday after today and have run out of time.
>>>> (b) Alex also reports that some of the plots have different binning
>>>> from the reference data, but I have not had time to check this.
>>>> 
>>>> Alex, you did ask for suggestions for work to do on this before next
>>>> term, so I suggest you work out (if you haven't already done so) how
>>>> to compile Rivet with your own copy of the H1 analysis routine, and
>>>> fix this to work with positrons and with the same binning as the
>>>> reference data. Then next month, if no-one beats us to it, we can
>>>> submit your corrected version and you will be a step further towards
>>>> writing your own analysis routine.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ben
>>>> 
>>>> On 18/12/09 16:53, Andy Buckley wrote:
>>>>> Hi Ben,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can you update the analysis to get this right?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Andy
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Peter Richardson wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Ben,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That looks like I've copied and pasted something I shouldn't have
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Ben Waugh wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> One of the project students working with Jon and me has discovered
>>>>>>> what looks like a bug in the Rivet routine H1_2000_S4129130 (H1
>>>>>>> energy flow in DIS). The paper relates to e+p data, but the code
>>>>>>> enforces e-p input.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Are we missing something or is this a mistake?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Ben
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Rivet mailing list
>>>>>> Rivet at projects.hepforge.org
>>>>>> http://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>