[Rivet] use of VetoedFinalState in various analyses

[Jonathan Butterworth]

looks like a bug to me too. Any comments from the maintainers?

Hendrik Hoeth wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm looking at the usage of our VetoedFinalState. Is there a reason
> that we veto muons above 1 GeV but accept antimuons in the following
> analyses:
> 
> CDF_1994_S2952106 (CDF Run I color coherence analysis)
> CDF_2005_S6217184 (CDF Run II jet shape analysis)
> CDF_2008_S7782535 (CDF Run II b-jet shape paper)
> D0_2004_S5992206  (D0 Run II jet azimuthal decorrelation analysis)
> 
> To me this looks like a bug, but maybe the authors/maintainers of those
> analyses can comment?
> 
>    Hendrik
> 

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Prof. Jonathan Butterworth,              http://www.hep.ucl.ac.uk/~jmb/
Physics and Astronomy Department                  Tel: +44 20 7679 3444
ATLAS, CERN                                       Tel: +41 22 76  72340
University College London                 Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, UK
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~