|
[Rivet] Analyses extended with more dataEmily Nurse nurse at fnal.govTue Jul 21 11:12:28 BST 2009
Hi Frank, There is a similar situation with the CDF Z + bjets analyses http://projects.hepforge.org/rivet/analyses#CDF_2008_S8095620 The previous analysis was already in Rivet - it is now completely superseded and actually not a very useful analysis anyway but the conclusion was to keep it in. It should of course never be used in the same tune as the new analysis as the data is a subset, which I guess also applies to your case. Cheers, Emily. On 19 Jul 2009, at 23:35, Frank Siegert wrote: > Hi Riveters, > > What is our policy regarding analyses that have been updated later > with > more data, do we want them in Rivet at all, regardless of how similar > their method/result is to the updated one? One such example is > > http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0512020 (CDF_2006_S6450792) > http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.2204 (CDF_2008_S7828950) > > (though I haven't checked the details of their midpoint cone > algorithm for > differences) > > The latter is already in Rivet, and the former I have ready to > commit, but > don't know whether I should. If it should go in (i.e. if I don't > hear any > contrary opinions), I'm definitely going to put a notice about the > update > into the analysis description. > > Frank > > _______________________________________________ > Rivet mailing list > Rivet at projects.hepforge.org > http://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/rivet
More information about the Rivet mailing list |