|
[Rivet-svn] r2962 - trunk/docblackhole at projects.hepforge.org blackhole at projects.hepforge.orgTue Feb 22 23:48:08 GMT 2011
Author: buckley Date: Tue Feb 22 23:48:07 2011 New Revision: 2962 Log: Adding documentation about analysis statuses, validation, and the preliminary and unvalidated special analysis libraries Modified: trunk/doc/rivet-manual.tex Modified: trunk/doc/rivet-manual.tex ============================================================================== --- trunk/doc/rivet-manual.tex Tue Feb 22 23:47:34 2011 (r2961) +++ trunk/doc/rivet-manual.tex Tue Feb 22 23:48:07 2011 (r2962) @@ -310,6 +310,50 @@ listed in \AppendixRef{app:agilerunmc}. +\subsection{Analysis status} + +The standard Rivet analyses are divided into three classes: validated, +preliminary, and unvalidated (in decreasing order of academic +acceptability). + +The Rivet ``validation procedure'' is not (as of February 2011) formally +defined, but generally implies that an analysis has been checked to ensure +reproduction of MC points shown in the paper where possible, and is believed to +have no outstanding issues with analysis procedure or cuts. Additionally, +analyses marked as ``validated'' and distributed with Rivet should normally have +been code-checked by an experienced developer to ensure that the code is a good +example of Rivet usage and is not more complex than required or otherwise +difficult to read or maintain. Such analyses are regarded as fully ready for use +in any MC validation or tuning studies. + +Validated analyses which implement an unfinished piece of experimental work are +considered to be trustworthy in their implementation of a conference note or +similar ``informal'' publication, but do not have the magic stamp of approval +that comes from a journal publication. This remains the standard mark of +experimental respectability and accordingly we do not include such analyses in +the Rivet standard analysis libraries, but in a special ``preliminary'' +library. While preliminary analyses may be used for physics studies, please be +aware of the incomplete status of the corresponding experimental study, and also +be aware that the histograms in such analyses may be renamed or removed +entirely, as may the analysis itself. Preliminary analyses will not have a +SPIRES preprint number, and hence on their move into the standard Rivet analysis +library they will normally undergo a name change: please ensure when you upgrade +between Rivet versions that any scripts or programs which were using preliminary +analyses are not broken by the disappearance or change of that analysis in the +newer version. The minor perils of using preliminary analyses can be avoided by +the cautious by building Rivet with the \kbd{-{}-disable-preliminary} +configuration flag, in which case their temptation will not even be offered. + +Finally, unvalidated analyses are those whose implementation is incomplete, +flawed or just troubled by doubts. Running such analyses is not a good idea if +you aren't trying to fix them, and Rivet's command line tools will print copious +warning messages if you do. Unvalidated analyses in the Rivet distribution are +not built by default, as they are only of interest to developers and would be +distracting clutter for the majority of users: if you \emph{really} need them, +building Rivet with the \kbd{-{}-enable-unvalidated} configuration flag will +slake your thirst for danger. + + \subsection{Example \kbd{rivet} commands} \begin{itemize}
More information about the Rivet-svn mailing list |